الفجوة بين الوضع القائم و المنشود في تطبيق مبادئ الأرجونيمكس (هندسة العوامل البشرية)‎ على بيئة العمل كما يراها أعضاء هيئة التدريس و الإداريون في جامعة مؤتة

Abstract EN

This study aimed to determine the gap volume between "what is" and "what ought to be" in the application of ergonomic principles in work environment from the teaching and administrative staff at Mu'tah University.

A questionnaire including 4 dimensions (physical, cognitive, organizational, and environmental) was developed and administered to a 720 participants.

The study employed the descriptive approach including a survey questionnaire.

The results showed that the gap between "what is" and "what "ought to be" was high at the 4 dimensions of the measure.

The mean was (1.55) with a standard deviations of (0.36).

The results showed a difference that could be attributed to the "gender" of the participants in favour of males.

It also showed a difference that could be attributed to "weight" in the physical ergonomics favoring those whose weight was 80.

However, the results showed that the difference in weight at the cognitive and organizational dimension was in favor of those who weighted -60; the results were in favor of those whose weight was between -60 and 80+ at the environmental dimension.

No difference was indicated in the findings that could be attributed to: task, long, and age.

The study recommended that the gap between "what is" and "What ought to be" should be abridged in the application of ergonomic principles at Mu'tah University.