دور الذكاء الثقافي في رسم السياسة المحلية : بحث ميداني

Abstract EN

This research aims to examine the correlation and the impact of Cultural Intelligence with their dimensions (Strategy, Knowledge, Motivation, Behavior) on Drawing Local politics and their dimensions (Empowerment, Flexibility, Organizational Justice, Local Funding) In Dhi Qar Provincial Council To determine the extent of the presence of significant statistical differences between research variables Due to the recent experiment which requires clarification of the role of the pivotal and important carried out by the provincial council in the exercise of his work in light of the diversity of cultures and the peculiarities of the local community, which may impede the provision of equal services to all those parties were chosen this research.

The importance emanated through the identification and dissemination of cultural intelligence and work to entrench the concept in a scientific and practical in the minds of members in order to enhance the value and type of local politics drawn by them to get to a state of satisfaction among the individual and the community alike.

The current research adopted the descriptive analytical method to accomplish, since the data were collected from 31 members representing the research community full form to be considered the most specialized in the research variables and employed for this purpose resolution, adopted the research program (SPSS V.21) (Excel 2010) with methods of statistics descriptive (Cronbach's alpha test of truthfulness, percentages, mean, coefficient of variation, standard deviation, simple Pearson correlation coefficient, simple regression coefficient) to test the hypotheses, The research concluded the most prominent among the findings of an association and the influence of moral and cultural intelligence in shaping domestic policy dimensions with a weak effect was not significant to the cultural dimensions of intelligence (behavior, knowledge) in drawing local politics , the research included four axes first went to the methodology and second to theoretical frame and the third to view and analyze the results and test hypotheses while the fourth was devoted to the conclusions and recommendations.