تقييم دور الجامعات في ترسيخ مستوى الوعي الوطني لدى طلبتها من وجهة نظر الطلبة أنفسهم تبعا لبعض المتغيرات : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

This research aimed at identifying the assessment degree of the role of university in the establishment of national awareness through the perspective of the students and identifying the differences in assessment according to the variables of the research (gender, academic grade, place of residence, level of income, type of university and nationality).

An instrument of 34 items was developed, judged by 10 specialized arbitrators and after that, its validity and reliability were extracted on an experimental sample of (46) male and female students out of the main sample of the study.

The tool showed high significance and accordingly, the tool of the study was applied on the main sample of the study which consisted of 208 male and female students: (128) students from private universities and (80) students from public universities.

The validity of the tool on the main sample was checked by extracting the factorial validity and content validity whereby all the items revealed good correlation coefficients that ranged between (0.687) maximum and (0.307) minimum all of which were statistically significant at (0.01) and their reliability was verified using split – half and Chronbach Alpha methods and reached (0.833) (0.898) respectively which are good values for the purpose of the research.

The results of answering the first question of the research, after drawing out the means and standard deviations, showed that the assessment of the sample concerning the role of the university in establishing national awareness ranged between medium and high.

The evaluation was high on the total score of the tool in general.

In response to the second question of the research, using one – way ANOVA related to the differences in assessment according to the variables of the research, the results revealed no statistically significant differences in the assessment of the sample of the role of the university in the establishment of national awareness due to gender, academic grade, type of university and nationality while there were statistically significant differences at (0.05) on the total score of performance in their assessment of the role of university due to the effect of place of residence and income in favor of nomadic students over the students of the capital and governorates and in favor of the category of less than JOD 800 income over the two categories of JOD (800 – 2000) and (+4000), whereas the differences among other categories were of no statistical significance.

The results also showed statistical significance at (0.05) in the interaction between gender and place of residence in favor of nomadic females over their peers in the governorates and the capital, and in favor of the males of the capital and governorates.

The results revealed statistical significance at (0.05) in the interaction between gender and type of university in favor of public university students over private university students for the two genders in general.

The results also revealed statistical significance at (0.05) in the interaction between place of residence and type of university in favor of public university students in the capital and governorates over their peers of private university students in the capital and governorates but in favor of the nomadic students of private universities over their Peers of nomadic students of public universities.

The results indicated statistical significance at (0.05) in the interaction between gender, type of university and income in favor of the females of less than JOD 800 income at private universities and the category of JOD (800 – 2000) over their peers of public universities of the same two categories, while it was in favor of the females of over JOD (4000) income at the public universities over their peers of private universities.

It was in favor of the males of less than JOD 800 income at private universities and of over JOD (4000) over their peers of public universities of the same two categories.

However it was in favor of the males of JOD (800 – 2000) and (2000 – 4000) at public universities over their peers of private universities of the same two categories.