العدالة الجنائية الانتقالية في نطاق المحاكم الجنائية الدولية

Abstract EN

The concept of transitional justice remains vague or ambiguous, especially as it is vague in its first part "transitional".

despite this ambiguity, trials are the first large category of transitional justice mechanisms, and although there are many options that may be available for the judicial system on the horizon of transitional justice, but generally it’s preferable to resort to local trials.

they can strengthen local capacity to pursuit under international law.

all states are committed to investigate human rights crimes after committing them and impose sanctions on those responsible for them.

at the international level, the idea of transitional justice has been linked to conflict and post-conflict societies.

this legal pattern is based on judicial and non-judicial proceedings.

it is completely different from the classical justice concept embodied in the judiciary facility and as a result of the lessons learned from the experience of the ICTY, A new model of international justice emerged: hybrid courts operated under the joint supervision of the un and the states concerned, an attempt to mix the benefits of national pursuits with international participation; the rule of law and transitional justice have been achieved by the contemporary international community through the establishment of a permanent international criminal court relied upon in achieving a large and important part of the requirements of that justice.