سلطة تأديب الموظف العام في التشريع العماني : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

Abstract EN

humans The .procedures its and trials disciplinary regulationfor accurate and good require justices Disciplinary com- ,misconducts doing by services his during faults commit ma^ servant public ,therefore,fault commit may violating the punish to right the administration public the giving duties his violate that omissions or missions shall person violating the that is point crucial The .authority disciplinary competent the through servant public jurisdic- different among debatable still is servant public of definition the since "servant public" of title the hold tions.

,social s'state the to according ,legislator the from attention due the receives authority Disciplinary؛econom some ,authority Disciplinary of organization the in vary legislations states Therefore .philosophies political and disciplinary entrust accordingly and "approach efficiency"" interest administration support to opted them of "approach justice" servant public if interest the support to opted other ,itself administration the to authority provide and balance the strikes approach last the And •judiciary the within process disciplinary for provide and his .control judicial b^ guaranteed authority disciplinary administrative for؛ /{autho- disciplinary explores stud therein adopted approach the determine to jurisdiction Omani under rity