أثر الأنظمة الانتخابية في التشريع العراقي

Abstract EN

There are a number of electoral systems vary according to what countries adopt from the philosophy they adopt in popular representation, such as direct and indirect election.

It goes without saying that direct election is the origin because it is in line with the general principles of democracy, indirect election is an out of origin and therefore its adoption needs justifications The second system may differentiate between collective and individual candidacy.

Some systems stop at the first without allowing individual candidates to stand alone.

This supports the parties and the parties.

Political t on the individual account, and others do the opposite to the detriment of political parties and groups, and perhaps the best systems that mix and blends between the two systems.

However, most of the legislation depends on the electoral list.

Some of them adopt the list, but the list term also includes the individual system.

On the one hand, we see that the list system can be derived from a list of systems that follow the type of list and are called by its name.

Such as closed, open or closed lists with preferential voting.

The philosophy of inclusiveness of representation varies from country to country and from legislator to second.

The legislator, who believes that there should be room for broad representation even if the segment is represented by a small number, speaks about it on the ground.

Their opponents may try to confuse the public authorities between the elite that represent large political parties and entities and deprive them of small ones, and achieve this goal through the use of the majority system.