تخريجات النحاة الفلسفية لما خالف أقيستهم من الشواهد الشعرية

Abstract EN

This study dealt with the results of philosophical grammarians, when they violated their grammar.

The study is important to know how it’s used in context and its linguistics’ used, and how the grammarians went back to take the citations that violated their measurement, which put their painted origins.

They met these citations with languages’ play and denied some of them, despite the recognition of their fluency, which led them for far outcomes which look differently from surface structure, and it is away from the meaning which is said, all this because it did not fall under their origins that they put, which made grammar subjected to philosophy and logic.

This descriptive, analytical study has come up with the followings:1- The grammarians responded with a lot of citations' even though they acknowledged their fluency winch led them look differently, and it wasn't meant what’s said.

2- The grammarians fell in confusion when they considered language are different dialects when they get their pamted rules and it led them to play with the language and making the texts wrong.