خلاف الأولى : دراسة أصولية تطبيقية
Other Title(s)
Shoud not to be : fundamentalism and applied studying
Author
Source
مجلة كلية الشريعة و القانون تفهنا الأشرف-دقهلية
Issue
Vol. 22, Issue 4 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.3387-3434, 48 p.
Publisher
Al-Azhar University Faculty of Sharia & Law in Tafahna El-Ashraf
Publication Date
2020-12-31
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
48
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Other than the first as one of the Islamic rulings that we would like to hear about, the fundamentalists differed in its position of Islamic rulings, although it is certainly confirmed by everyone its existence, since it is no different for two to leave a certain year hated from the hated, and this is not desirable, but the degree of his hatred is not like the one who has clarified four, or wiped his head twice! If they agree on the sex of the hated, then some fundamentalists have counted the difference of the former as a middle ground between the hated and permissit, which is what i have shown in this research.
American Psychological Association (APA)
إبراهيم، عمر عبد الفتاح محمد. 2020. خلاف الأولى : دراسة أصولية تطبيقية. مجلة كلية الشريعة و القانون تفهنا الأشرف-دقهلية،مج. 22، ع. 4، ص ص. 3387-3434.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1011288
Modern Language Association (MLA)
إبراهيم، عمر عبد الفتاح محمد. خلاف الأولى : دراسة أصولية تطبيقية. مجلة كلية الشريعة و القانون تفهنا الأشرف-دقهلية مج. 22، ع. 4 (2020)، ص ص. 3387-3434.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1011288
American Medical Association (AMA)
إبراهيم، عمر عبد الفتاح محمد. خلاف الأولى : دراسة أصولية تطبيقية. مجلة كلية الشريعة و القانون تفهنا الأشرف-دقهلية. 2020. مج. 22، ع. 4، ص ص. 3387-3434.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1011288
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
-
Record ID
BIM-1011288