شركة الشخص الواحد : دراسة تأصيلية

Abstract EN

The one-person company has been accepted in the world of business.

The most legal acts have approved in the world for the advantages they have.

Despite its spread and approval, some problems have preoccupied some of which is the inconsistency with the fundamentals is provided in the law, language and Islamic law.

The company is defined in the law that it is a contract necessitating provide of diversity pillar not existed in the one-person company.

In the Islamic law, the jurists have agreed upon the diversity for holding the company.

Linguistically, the “company” word is stemmed from participation and association between two persons and more.

It is inconsistent with “One- person” requiring the rooting study for research and review the truth of inconsistency and using the comparative analytical descriptive methodology.

The study has concluded that the origin if the idea of specification of a part to perform a project gone back the Roman Era.

The Muslim jurists have approved in the case of “the authorized slave to trade”.

Consequently, the modern legal thought has influenced.

From the side of language, naming the name of “Company” is a sound name for the transition of the word from the linguistic to the customary fact.

The definition of company that it is a contract resulted in its refusal, considering it as void, and not existed, therefore, the study recommends adding a provision allow for the person to establish the company.