الوضع القانوني للأرض و الاضطرابات الاجتماعية في الأندلس : ثورة الربض

Abstract EN

SummaryThe Revolution of the suburb of Cordoba received great attention from the researchers who wrote about the history of Al-Andalus, but their perception of it is almost typical.

When we returned to the quote of Ibn Hayyan (The Second Book) and deeply searched the rest of the sources, it seemed that this revolution has a different reality from the one that circulated, which led us to rewrite about it.

In our study, we concluded that this was not only a military clash between the inhabitants of the suburb of Cordoba and al-Hakam ibn Hisham the umayyad, but also a deeper problem associated with the ambiguity and disruption of the legal status of the land in Al-Andalus.

It was also clear that the conflict had been long (15 years) and had known military and verbal clashes and doctrinal arguments between Al-Hakam, who claims ownership of the land of the suburb, and his right to exploit it in the way he wants, and the inhabitants of the suburb who refuse that.

Because the problem is legal in nature, the jurists dragged into it as representatives of legitimate authority in the country, thus broadening the conflict front and further complicating things.

This mixture reflected in its disastrous results, with the total destruction of the suburb, the murder of a great number of its inhabitants and the expulsion of the rest of its country and homeland.