جرائم الإرهاب في القضاء الدولي الجنائي

Abstract EN

Despite the ugliness of the acts that are described as terrorist crimes and the effects they leave in terms of human, material and moral losses, members of the international community have not agreed on formulating an overarching definition of it, so political, ideological, and even interests of interests often have a major role in imposing views on the proposition and the difference in Concepts related to developing a unified definition of terrorism, and therefore the difficulty of finding mechanisms to counter it internationally.

The aim of the study is to try to reach the reasons for not establishing a unified concept of terrorism, while giving hypotheses to answer by considering it as an existing crime in itself, or as a special criminal intent for already existing crimes that must double the penalty, and reaching the concept of terrorism The international community and knowing the available and possible mechanisms to combat it as an international crime by setting the hypothesis of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court for terrorism crimes, and dissecting the role of the International Special Tribunal for Lebanon, to reach the result of the lack of jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court with terrorist crimes and the necessity of amending the provisions of the system Its primary.