إشكالية اللاجئين مع أخلاقيات الحدود المغلقة عند كريستوفر هيث ويلمان: النظرية الأخلاقية والممارسة العملية

Abstract EN

The American philosopher Christopher heath Wellman (1967-) defended closed borders to refugees and called for the brutal militarization of borders.

therefore, this research aims to: - presenting the moral criticism of the arguments he made against the rights of refugees within open borders, such as the argument for freedom to form societies, the right to the independence of the group, the argument for the right of legitimate, sovereign and authority states to close their borders and forcibly exclude refugees from the borders to prevent them from crossing the borders and forcing them to return to their countries.

- offering moral criticism of Wellman's solutions to address the refugee problem, such as providing Samaritan material assistance in their homelands, defending military intervention in their homelands, defending the legitimacy of assassinating leaders of corrupt political systems in order to defend human rights, and showing that these arguments are fragile, weak, and flimsy.

morally and practically speaking, and they vanish in front of the rights of refugees.

- presenting (criticism of criticism), which is a criticism of Wellman's position on his rejection of the argument (equality / liberalism / individual ownership / globalization / democracy / utilitarianism) because all of these arguments support the rights of refugees not to be excluded and with open borders.

presenting a moral defense of the right of refugees within borders completely open to refugees.

strengthening the ethics of border guards and border control in order to reject the use of violence against refugees at the borders.