(إن هذان لساحران)‎ إشكالية مزعومة و قرآنية صحيحة

Abstract EN

Without a doubt, that the Holy Qur`an differs from all other heavenly books, not by the source, which all came from, but by many essential differences, that made distinction between them, such as the promise preservation Qur`an, it “ no falsehood can approach it from before or behind it”, it the main miracle to prophet of Allah Muhammad “ peace be upon him”, moreover it came with Arabic explained illustrated tongue, that mains, at least, it came on Arstandards, and their language rules.

So, Many suspicions have been raised about its eloquence, rhetoric, and occurd the solecism in it.

Those which depended on narrations was attributed to the ancestors, which made the one who challenges the Qur`an from grammatical side was bulided on a basis seems durable, in addition, some of linguistics statements which affirmed those narrations.

The verse (63) of s`urat Tahaa (These two are certainly mgicians) one of the most important of these calumniations or suspicions.

In this paper I study this verse a syntactic, and analystic study, and divided it into four items, the first item discusses the ancestors`s narrations, which alleged that the solecism occurs in Qur`an.

, the second item shows the recitations of this verse, whereas the third one talks about the Holy Qur`an`s recitation alone, and the last item talks about the saying that the Qur`an and the recitations are dissimilar two truths.

Then finalizing with conclusion