الشعر و الفلسفة أوجه الاختلاف

Abstract EN

This research is a very late attempt, since the researcher before me the evidence of the first team, the position of the link between philosophy and poetry, and found it important to look at the evidence of the other team, which I found in a different fluorescence, which, despite the lack, However, they objectively explain the negation of this relationship, which in general was continental evidence at the core of poetry.

It is also a continent at the heart of philosophy, and the researcher in all the above evidence did not say in his opinion or support the views of the writers who were transferred.

It is necessary to say: The researcher in the relationship of philosophy poetry does not find what satisfies ambitious, or increases in capacity, the literary article that the researcher begins to follow, find them included in other topics, within the books of philosophical or literary, were not at the basis of the draft writer, But the continuation of the topics overlap, which included the relationship, which interrupts the researcher to the focus of the exact issue that is important to seize his research.

It is also necessary to say that most of the writers who fought in that relationship, and adopted twinning with poetry, took a structural approach.

The descriptive literature issues are mostly comparative and differing points of view, supported by mascots that depend on culture, experience and sound monetary sense.

The subject of poetry and philosophy is different from all literary issues.

For anyone who deals with this relationship with its positive content, he may draw from his creative imagination an expressive means in which he tries hard to prove the relationship.

Specifically objective evidence, supported by the view of you On the basis of which the historical evidence, or evidence that leads the reader to fully convinced of the point of view based on linkage; the reason for the delinquency of the book, philosophers and the construction of the embryo is not holding tightly, but the most vague ions, trying to prove the relationship, The author's imagination is a poetic means of expression that, if it is true, generates temporary convictions, or deludes into a world of futile imposition.

It goes without saying that the views expressed in denying the relationship between philosophy and poetry far outweigh what has been said in its proof.

The evidence presented by the writers, who are concerned with the conviction of the difference between philosophy and poetry, can find effective evidence, The recipient, to convince him that what is said about the difference of philosophy and poetry, represents a point of view can be taken, and reassurance to its substantive results.

Therefore, the owners of the dispute can be proud of their evidence of the construction digression, and replace it with historical evidence and other language, and the level of gossip, definition and some other objective evidence