الحجاج الحواري بين الله و إبليس في النص القرآني : قراءة منطقية برهانية

Abstract EN

This research 'The Dialogical Argumentation between Allah and Iblis in the QuranicText: A Logical Demonstrative Reading' came in the light of the argumentation theorywith its logical representations, linguistic instruments and psychological demonstration.

The topic displays the central textualities of the study embodied in the holy contextswhere the dialogue between Allah and Iblis was presented regarding the theme ofprostrating before Adam in four sites: Al-A›raf, Al-Hijr, Al-Isra and Sad.

These dialoguescommenced with debate and argument where two adversary visions of faith and infidelitywere distinguished.

The holy text aimed to demonstrate the appositeness of the olute truth for thecosmic recipient under which we are necessarily joined beside the explicit recipient thatwas represented by Angels, Adam the prostrated to and Iblis who refused to prostrate.

This argumentation was a nucleus out of which Iblis launched the first infidelity.

Thisleads to state that the Quranic argumentative logic in general is guided by this core logic, the study of which is of considerable significance.

In another sequence, the research studiedthe narratives that recounted the prostration story in four sites also: Al-Baqarah, Al-Nisaa, Al-Kahf and Taha.

The image of Iblis in the holy text The research was prefaced withthe historical and epistemological background of the argumentation theories, then withessential topics discussing the logical consideration of the holy texts in question.

Thesetopics are first: Conviction methods including argumentative premises, reductio proof, dilemma, paradox and argumentation scale.

Second: linguistic argumentation.

Third: narrative argumentation.

Forth: Argumentation and Psychological.

The research was concluded with the main finding.