المسار النقدي لابن رشيق القيرواني في ضوء الحركة النقدية البيانية : رصد معرفي للمدونة النقدية العربية بين تغييب الذات و الحضور الأرسطي الممنهج

Abstract EN

It is necessarily agreed upon among the majority of Arab critics, literature historians, and those who follow the course of the ancient Arab criticism movement, both in old and in their modernity, that the presence of "Aristotle" and Greek thought in general was more evident in Ibn Jaafar's opinions of "before him, " who examined the Greek's heritage and gained a lot of from its meanings.

So, it was a reference thought on which he relied "before him" on in justifying his critical provisions for which he was unique.

Perhaps what proves this dependency on Ibn Rashiq's side of this thought, opinions, attitudes and anecdotal citations aired here and there in “Al-Umda”.

The latter reveals the extent of an explicit prophecy, which he also drew from his philosophical heritage and adopted some of his sayings.

How did Ibn Rashiq manage in his book Al-Umda, according to this perspective, and in the chapter on the science of the statement, to marry between the Aristotelian rule and the affectionate-tendency Arab poetic heritage?