الافتراض القانوني في فكرة المنقول بحسب المآل : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

When Iraqi civil legislator Department of things to movables and real estate according to the persistence of whether or not there is a range of things are given an exception to this origin, they are already drugs being in a fixed moment in the ground and treated as property in both rulings, but movables will become of the outcome in the near future meaning that its owner is the intention that these things be fixed in the ground movables because of vested with Kalosmar after pounds, and construction after demolition Vhven examples both longer drug Valosmar example, construction is movables according doomed in the future is here assuming the legislature that these properties inherently going to be transferred, according to fate presumably to specific targets