إرغام الدولة بالموافقة على الإغاثة الإنسانية من قبل الأمم المتحدة

Abstract EN

There is no disagreement as to whether the state's arbitrary withholding of consent to humanitarian relief is a violation of the rules of international humanitarian law, so it must be addressed either by the judiciary or by economic embargo and by the state's removal from the international community or by force (If necessary), and what is worth to mention all methods of coercion are entrusted to the United Nations through its organs.

Therefore, it is clear that the United Nations has a major and effective role in forcing the state to consent in order not to deprive civilians of humanitarianrelief to be delivered to them, This role is characterized by two qualities; first, the status of legitimacy, which means(the obligation of the state to compensate or impose an economic boycott on them or even using of force against them.

All these means are legitimate under the charter).

The second characteristic is that all these means have tangible and effective results in forcing the state because it carries the state with material and economic burdens that compel it to consent.