الخلافات في إثبات نسب ولد الزنا و موقف القوانين : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

The origin of the issue of proving the proportions of the child of adultery is that it is not permissible to prove it if the prostitute is a bedding for a husband or a master and the owner of the bed has not abandoned him.

He is his child and I claim that he is the one who claimed it.

The scholars are of the view that zakaah is obligatory for the child of the muezzin in this case.

It is not permissible, but they differed as to whether the adulterer is entitled to it.

It shall be attributed to the adulterer and shall be attached to him if he is qualified by the terms and conditions of the A sample identified by jurists.

Therefore, addressing this dilemma is a legitimate duty of the people of consideration and diligence in our time.

It is necessary to resolve it as it becomes more important in this age because it addresses a real problem and an important issue by reaching a comprehensive and accurate vision that represents a fundamental solution for the children of adultery leading to their fairness.

In the case of an adulterer, and if the adulterer does not have a mattress for a husband or a master, it is permissible to combine several meanings together, from keeping the family, offspring, bread and chastity.

Therefore, the study aims to remove the problems and answer questions, so as not to accuse Islamic jurisprudence of immobility and lack of realism and inability to find a solution to the problems that arise.

These questions include: What is the origin of the question of proving the proportions of the son of adultery known descent, and evidence? What are the doctrines of jurisprudence on the issue of proof of the proportions of the son of adultery and evidence? What is the criterion and the basis for weighting between words, and what are the reasons and reasons for this weighting, based on the historical, analytical and comparative approach.