غير بين التعريف و التنكير و الإعراب و البناء في ضوء المنهج الوصفي التحليلي

Abstract EN

This research deals with a "non-" study between definition and denial, an objective study Analytical, by rooting the rule, and following the opinions of grammarians with full induction And the encompassing the surrounding, so it is not useful in contrast to what is described if it is in the meaning of the subject's name, Whatever is not in its origin is to be a description that is affected by the syntax of what came before it.

The “not” is penetrated by the thumb, so only the denial is described by it, except where it is true The exception is because it ins from a phoneme and a meaning, and its study in the exception is in the syntax The sentence aims to elucidate the meaning, define it and indicate its final outcome, for it is its aim the desired.

It is provided other than if it is attributed to it, on the condition that everyone who was similar in character was it.

It is required by analogy and under custom to do what is mentioned.

It is forbidden to enter a thousand and a lam.

Because it is of no use from it, and because it has not been proven to have heard from pure Ar, and it was not mentioned in the Book of God Almighty, and adding it to what follows it indicates specificity rather than a definition.

And he meant the definition, towards: “I went through a movement that is not still” 0
We do not agree with the scholars of the Academy of Arabic Language and its sheikhs in their view that it is permissible Entering the thousand and blaming him and giving them the definition; Because this word was not mentioned defining By “the” in the Holy Qur'an, whether it is a noun or an adjective, because there is no evidence Hearing it out of size.

The Coffins went to construct a "change" on the obligatory conquest, and their argument in that was that it sprouted Manab "except" was added to the matrix, while the Basrians said that it is built as a permissibility It is not obligatory.

To add it to the non-able, and if it is added to the able, then it is not permissible to build it.

It is rather expressed.

Because adding to the non-able is permissible in the additive and building.

"Not" is to be charged to "unless" if it is described by it, but to carry it to "except" more
Who carried her on her; This is because the disposition is more in the name than in the letter.

It is permissible in the follower of the excluded by the observance of the word and the consideration of the meaning, as indicated by the Arabic imam Sibbuh in the chapter “What was done on a place that is“ not ”and not after“ not ”.