أثر الأسماء المشتركة في اختلاف الفقهاء : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

Verbal participation is achieved if the single word of the names is possible for those involved or more, by having more than one linguistic fact, and the names in which there is a lot of participation.

The use of common names in their meanings has led jurists to differ in the ruling of many branches of jurisprudence- in the field of worship or transactions-.

As for the common names in acts of worship: among them are the pronouncements: "touching, "prayer," and "duluk", "like", "today" and "menstruation".

As for the common names in the field of transactions: among them are the pronouncements: "the secret, "sultana, "the marriage, "and" the hand." If the disagreement occurred among the jurists because of the verbal sharing of names, it may be more likely to say that the participant generalized.

To be on the safe side in terms of worship and religion, such as the word "prayer." And "today, "Sultana," and" the nikah," where the saying that the participant generalizes is more likely because of the strength of his evidence.

It may be more likely to say that the participant carries one of his meanings because of the arrival of a statement from the Sunnah of the intended meaning, as is the case with the words: "the signs, "the parable, "the menstruation," and "the hand," where the Sunnah clarified that what is meant by the meaning is "the meridian," not the sunset, and that the duty is The reward for hunting is the proverb in what has a proverb and only value, and what is meant by "menstruation" is the place of menstruation, not its time.

And that what is meant by "by hand", in the case of theft, is to cut it off from the joint of the palm by the right hand; Where the evidence came from the actual Sunnah to clarify the intended meaning, as the Messenger of God cut off the palm from the right hand, and that the limit of the hands that God commanded to wipe in the verse of tayammum is wiping the hands to the hands.