الانتقال من دراسة التاريخ إلى فلسفة التاريخ : انتقال من التجربة إلى الخبرة

Other Title(s)

Moving from a history study to a philosophy of history : moving from experiment to experience

Joint Authors

مغيث، أنور
عزب، أحمد محمد صالح
رشيد أحمد محمد

Source

سر من رأى

Issue

Vol. 15, Issue 60 (30 Sep. 2019), pp.279-303, 25 p.

Publisher

University of Samarra College of Education

Publication Date

2019-09-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

25

Main Subjects

Philosophy

Topics

Abstract EN

There is a great overlap between the concept of time and the concept of history.

Time is present before the existence of man and not the human reason for existence.

Time is the thing between two periods in the past or in the future.

History is things that occur within time such as birth, death or migration.

We know the events based on this history with a link to past and next events.

The difference between the historian and the novelist is that the novelist is not tied to time and place, and it is not necessary to have the work free of contradiction.

The point at which the historian ends is the beginning for the philosopher of history in its purest and the results of the historian are the precursors of research when the philosopher of history.

The process of transition from history to philosophy of history, we reached the total results, a process of transition from the embodiment of the simple and partial to macro and from partial experiments to experience.

If the philosophy of history is experience, it is the wisdom and benefit we derive from the chaos of facts that have no connection between There is a great overlap between the concept of time and the concept of history.

Time is present before the existence of man and not the human reason for existence.

Time is the thing between two periods in the past or in the future.

History is things that occur within time such as birth, death or migration.

We know the events based on this history with a link to past and next events.

The difference between the historian and the novelist is that the novelist is not tied to time and place, and it is not necessary to have the work free of contradiction.

The point at which the historian ends is the beginning for the philosopher of history in its purest and the results of the historian are the precursors of research when the philosopher of history.

The process of transition from history to philosophy of history, we reached the total results, a process of transition from the embodiment of the simple and partial to macro and from partial experiments to experience.

If the philosophy of history is experience, it is the wisdom and benefit we derive from the chaos of facts that have no connection between them.

American Psychological Association (APA)

مغيث، أنور وعزب، أحمد محمد صالح ورشيد أحمد محمد. 2019. الانتقال من دراسة التاريخ إلى فلسفة التاريخ : انتقال من التجربة إلى الخبرة. سر من رأى،مج. 15، ع. 60، ص ص. 279-303.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1168372

Modern Language Association (MLA)

مغيث، أنور....[و آخرون]. الانتقال من دراسة التاريخ إلى فلسفة التاريخ : انتقال من التجربة إلى الخبرة. سر من رأى مج. 15، ع. 60 (أيلول 2019)، ص ص. 279-303.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1168372

American Medical Association (AMA)

مغيث، أنور وعزب، أحمد محمد صالح ورشيد أحمد محمد. الانتقال من دراسة التاريخ إلى فلسفة التاريخ : انتقال من التجربة إلى الخبرة. سر من رأى. 2019. مج. 15، ع. 60، ص ص. 279-303.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1168372

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

-

Record ID

BIM-1168372