PTH: Redefining Reference Ranges in a Healthy Population—The Role of Interfering Factors and the Type of Laboratory Assay

Joint Authors

Frigo, Anna Chiara
Iacobone, Maurizio
Torresan, Francesca
Censi, Simona
Manso, Jacopo
Mian, Caterina
Simmini, Stefano
Franceschet, Giulio
Zaninotto, Martina
De Silvestro, Giustina
Scaroni, Carla
Camozzi, Valentina
Plebani, Mario

Source

International Journal of Endocrinology

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-02-21

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Biology

Abstract EN

Introduction.

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a linear peptide constituted by 84 amino acids and active in its 1–84 form, but a wide range of PTH forms produced by its post-transcriptional modifications are present in blood.

Many assays with different specificities are commercially available.

The aim of our study was to compare a 2nd and 3rd generation in healthy population in order to better define the reference range in the healthy population residing in our region.

Materials and Methods.

108 subjects (53 females and 55 males) referring to the transfusion donor were enrolled in the study centre in April 2016 and underwent PTH levels measurements with a 3rd generation kit (chemiluminescent immunoassay DiaSorin Liaison) and with a 2nd generation kit (immunoradiometric assay Total Intact PTH Assay (Coated Tube), Scantibodies).

Also calcium, phosphate, creatinine, and 25OHD3 were measured.

A questionnaire on lifestyle and dietary habits was obtained.

Results.

The median PTH values obtained with the 2nd generation assay and the whole 3rd generation assay were 20.26 pg/ml and 23.11 pg/ml, respectively.

Bland–Altman method showed substantial concordance between the two PTH assays, although with an overestimation of the 3rd generation method over the 2nd generation method.

There was no correlation between 3rd generation PTH and 25OHD3 and creatinine.

Calcium was negatively correlated with PTH only when measured with 3rd generation kit.

Conclusions.

On the basis of our data, obtained from healthy subjects, we can conclude that the reference range used by our laboratory was too narrow and was necessary to reestablish normal ranges according to our population.

This is useful to avoid hyperparathyroidism misdiagnosis.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Censi, Simona& Iacobone, Maurizio& Simmini, Stefano& Manso, Jacopo& Franceschet, Giulio& Plebani, Mario…[et al.]. 2020. PTH: Redefining Reference Ranges in a Healthy Population—The Role of Interfering Factors and the Type of Laboratory Assay. International Journal of Endocrinology،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1170062

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Censi, Simona…[et al.]. PTH: Redefining Reference Ranges in a Healthy Population—The Role of Interfering Factors and the Type of Laboratory Assay. International Journal of Endocrinology No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1170062

American Medical Association (AMA)

Censi, Simona& Iacobone, Maurizio& Simmini, Stefano& Manso, Jacopo& Franceschet, Giulio& Plebani, Mario…[et al.]. PTH: Redefining Reference Ranges in a Healthy Population—The Role of Interfering Factors and the Type of Laboratory Assay. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1170062

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1170062