تقييم جودة المقررات الإلكترونية المقدمة عبر نظام إدارة التعلم الإلكتروني D2L بجامعة المجمعة في ضوء معايير منظمة كواليتي ماترز Quality Matters

Abstract EN

This study aimed at evaluating the quality of elec- tronic curriculums submitted via Electronic Learning Manage- ment system (D2L) at A1 Majmaah University in light of Quality Matters Organization's criteria.

The study also aimed at identi- fying which of the eight (QM) criteria pronounced in the list of Curriculum Quality Criteria electronically submitted has earned the highest rate of fulfillment.

In addition, it aimed at identifying the rate of fulfillment of these criteria for each electronic curric- ulum, and identifying the differences in the quality of criteria ac- cording to the scientific department that presents the curriculum at the university.

The current study has used the descriptive analytical method, which suits the nature of the study and its variables.

To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher used the criteria's list internationally arbitrated and accredited by Quality Matters Or- ganization, issued in 2013 to evaluate the quality of electronic curriculums that consists of (41) sub-criterion fall under eight mam criteria.

The study included all electronic curriculums submitted via (D2L) system during the second semester of Academic Year 1438/1439 (H) at A1 Majmaah University which consisted of (9) electronic curriculums presented to the university's male and fe- male students at all scientific and theoretical colleges.

The study has reached number of results in which it found that all curriculums has achieved less than (81/95) points in the gen- eral evaluation.; which means the need to be reviewed, devel- oped, and rehabilitated to achieve the minimum points required.

TWO criteria out of eight have achieved the highest and ultimate fulfillment rate; which are the sixth criterion (Technology used in the academic curriculum), and the seventh criterion (support- ing the learner) at all curriculums; whereas the other six criteria has achieved low to average fulfillment rate.

The study has also found that there were no statistically significant differences with significance level of (0.05) in the Quality of the electronic Cur- riculums according to the academic department that presents the electronic curriculum.

The study has recommended that the electronic curriculum should not be applied to all university students until testing it on a limited sample and ensuring its efficiency.

It also recom- mended a periodical review and evaluation of the system every three years as maximum; and to benefit from the study's results and tools to develop the electronic learning system and the work mechanism at the university.