Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators
Joint Authors
McWilliams, Lenora A.
Malecha, Ann
Source
Issue
Vol. 2017, Issue 2017 (31 Dec. 2017), pp.1-11, 11 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2017-01-29
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
11
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Objective.
The objective of this review was to compare traditional intravenous (IV) insertion instructional methods with the use of haptic IV simulators.
Design.
An integrative research design was used to analyze the current literature.
Data Sources.
A search was conducted using key words intravenous (IV) insertion or cannulation or venipuncture and simulation from 2000 to 2015 in the English language.
The databases included Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Complete, Education Resource Information Center, and Medline.
Review Methods.
Whittemore and Knafl’s (2005) strategies were used to critique the articles for themes and similarities.
Results.
Comparisons of outcomes between traditional IV instructional methods and the use of haptic IV simulators continue to show various results.
Positive results indicate that the use of the haptic IV simulator decreases both band constriction and total procedure time.
While students are satisfied with practicing on the haptic simulators, they still desire faculty involvement.
Conclusion.
Combining the haptic IV simulator with practical experience on the IV arm may be the best practice for learning IV insertion.
Research employing active learning strategies while using a haptic IV simulator during the learning process may reduce cost and faculty time.
American Psychological Association (APA)
McWilliams, Lenora A.& Malecha, Ann. 2017. Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators. Nursing Research and Practice،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1193443
Modern Language Association (MLA)
McWilliams, Lenora A.& Malecha, Ann. Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators. Nursing Research and Practice No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1193443
American Medical Association (AMA)
McWilliams, Lenora A.& Malecha, Ann. Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators. Nursing Research and Practice. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1193443
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1193443