الإرهاب والتكفير: قراءة سوسيولوجية

Abstract EN

Were not social interpretations of religion over the past centuries far from terrorism, although the message of religion – we mean.

Heavenly religions-does not fit, but intersect close doors of dialogue and focusing differences instead of approaches and aspects of the agreement till these differences become a target for itself.

And the intent to stir up division and conversion the dispute to the conflictane the conflict into a war, and talk about terrorist does not necessarily require references to religion so that terrorist groups such as the Red Brigades and Initiated Lennhoff were not launched from religious authorities and perhaps even if we proceed from words Macfhir alternative as Marxism religion or fascism, for example.

But in the Arab world Islamic terrorist act adhere to religion where it poses what he wants from interpretations and re-read texts wrongly (according to the past patterns), to create apologetic reference to this act to the extent that it hurt the other, but to kill and destroy him without the slightest sense of guilt.

Religious tolerance turn into a severe intolerance and distasteful when religion become a sect or sects all of them think itꞌs the absolute right and the other are infidels, and should be eliminated without mercy, and the longer the conflict time whenever accumulated hatred, and the number of (speakers) and (Pedant) of this party or that, whenever widened avoidance space.

This brief study examines this controversial labor between religion, politically interpreted and politics religiously explained.

Although the political activity that it based on religious authority does not necessarily involve damage if it is based on the principles of tolerance, dialogue and acceptance of other, this activity become harmful ifit was based on erroneous reading or moody explanations.