تعارض التوثيق في الراوي الواحد عند اللإمامين الذهبي و ابن حجر في سنن أبي داود و الترمذي

Abstract EN

Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and prayers and peace be upon His Messenger the Secretary In this research, which I called (the conflict of authentication in the narrator between the two golden imams and Ibn Hajar / applied study ) of the Sunan Abu Daoud and Tirmidhi The narrators who were documented by al-Zahabi in his book al-Kashif, and Ibn Hajar said in his book al-Takrib (Makbool .

I have limited my studies to some models of Abu Dawood and Tirmidhi, and the extent of Ibn Hajar's approval of the gold for these narrators, and draw the rule of each of them, which corresponds with the words of critics, and know the degree of the conversations of each of them, especially the director at the owners of Sunan Dawood and al-Tirmidhi .

The research : came in the introduction and two articles In which it dealt with the importance of the subject, its objectives, the research methodology as well as the research plan.

The first topic, which dealt with the preliminary study, and two requirements, the first requirement; definition of the wound and the amendment language terminology The second requirement; the definition of trust and acceptable language and terminology The second topic was the applied study of narrators What is agreed upon by the narration about him is Abu Daoud and alTirmidhi And the second; it is narrated by Abu Daoud And the third is not narrated by al-Tirmidhi Then the conclusion, which mentioned the most important findings of the study of the results, then proven sources and references, and the index of topics.