ريتشارد رورتي و العقل المرآوي

Abstract EN

In this article we will talk about Rorty's view to the theory of knowledge which can be considered in the decomposition of any philosophical tradition.

due to the link between philosophical thought and theory of knowledge, it became difficult to imagine philosophy away from epistemology : this is the picture that cant presented of the western mind, i.

e.

there is no place for philosophy without the theory of knowledge, this is what the systemic philosophies imposed from the time of Plato until the emergence of philosophies (Cartesian, Kantian and positional).

the theory of knowledge refers to the existence of an essence for the human being, it's established by these philosophies and it believes that human has an essence and he seeks to discover the rest of the other essences.

this is what was manifested in the philosophy if Democritus and Descartes from the view that the world is a collection of things and so our vitreous essence must clarify our knowledge of nature, the latter, which constituted an obsession for philosophers, as there is a problem which is “nature” in the face of human, this is what rorty exposed in his book “philosophy and mirror of nature”.

in this article, we'll examine some of the justifications that rorty provided to refute the theory of knowledge, as anyone can ask about it.