دفع مسؤولية الحارس للآلات والأشياء الخطرة

Abstract EN

The cases before the courts have shown that there are many cases in which the victims are unable to prove the fault of the guard of the machine, which means that they are harmed without the guilt of genoa, which inevitably compromises justice, and hence the situation has evolved to the point where the liability of the custodian of the machine is presumed to be presumed wrong.

a harmful act is one of the most important and practical sources of commitment in working life after the decade.

responsibility has been and remains the subject of extensive and in-depth studies.

it is the first involuntary source of obligation arising from an incident in which the law has an effect, that is, an obligation, which is called in postural doctrine of tort or responsibility for wrongful act, and the Jordanian civil code has opted for the expression of the injurious act.

the question is, is the liability of the machinery of dangerous things expired? this is what we will discuss in this study through two sections, then a conclusion to review the most important findings and recommendations reached.