معالجة التأصيليين و الحداثيين لقضايا المرأة

Abstract EN

The Arab reformist thought has been preoccupied with the political, social and cultural means of confrontation due to the tyranny and tyranny the nation suffers from and the various visions in this regard.

he considered man "a man and a woman" as the basis for reform and change.

the Arab reformist elite’s discourse on women has taken a liberating and regenerative dimension by reading religious texts based on the purposes of Shari’a in spreading the values of justice and equality, dialogue and acquaintance with others, and other human values and renaissance principles that represent the way and outlet for the civilizational crisis ...

However, the matter is not safe from differences.

so, there was a trend in which Muhammad Abdo and al-Hajwi were the most prominent representatives and believed that the last of the nation could not be reformed except by what was correct in the beginning of it, meaning that the recipe lies in returning to the first appointed by following the example of the righteous ancestor at the time of the message, and that will only purify the stagnation of the religion.

and in another direction, Qasim Amin was the most prominent of those who said it, and he sees the whereabouts of the disease in the remnants of the past, and that the medicine is to overcome it.

these lawsuits were the start of the thought of modernity, which is creeping into the two bonds of "Islam" and "Arabism", and it establishes an analogy that places Western societies at the top of the "age" ladder, and this is what was with, so that imitating the phenomena of Western civilization or moving away from it became the criterion of progress or backwardness.

the boldness of the proposition in two directions compared to the period of time in which the discussion came, makes us discern a courage based on the foundations of attachment to the principles and understanding based on reading the text and applying the mind and thinking about the problem and the solution from the standpoint of collective perceptions and not with what strikes it.