أدب الحوار مع المخالفين من خلال السنة النبوية

Abstract EN

There is no doubt that difference is an issue that must occur and its solution is through dialogue ,and the establishment of an argument .If someone looks at the Prophetic Sunnah, he will find that ,it has devoted a great deal of space to the dialogue and its etiquette for its significance.

This study aims to explain the prophetic approach in dialogue with the contrary part ، whether he is associated with the Sunnis groups, especially in case of dialogue eruption due to differences between them, or the dialogue in the event of wrangle and conflict.

As well as discussing dialogue with the counterpart that is associated with the people of Bidaa, (Those who deviates from the right way) including the dialogue of the (Prophet- peace be upon him) with one of the Kharijites.

Ibn Abbas, may God bless him, also conducted a dialogue with the Kharijites.

The study also addressed the dialogue of non-Muslim flip side, such as the Prophet's Dialogue with Mecca’s Heathens, and his dialogue with the Jews and Christians.

The study , also addressed some of the ethics that should be put into consideration in the dialogue, including the dedication of the intention to Allah Almighty, and the empowerment with knowledge, good listening , avoid boycotting, maintain justice, fairness, and self-discipline.

The study used the descriptive analytical method, with the attribution, referral and citations followed in the scientific research methodology.

The study arrives to the following findings: 1.Muslims must follow the prophet and take him as a role model in the dialogue.

The consequences of not sticking to the etiquettes of dialogue that founded by the Prophet (Peace be upon him), led to the violence and atonement that we see nowadays.

3.The main purpose of dialogue, is to reveal the truth, then the dialogue with the counterpart has certain rules and conditions, that should be followed.

4.The real Muslim, who believes in God and the resurrection day should not accuse others by atonement, except with more proof as clear as sun.

5.The interlocutor should be patient and doesn’t haste for the results, moreover, he should be equipped with knowledge and shouldn’t talk about a subject he doesn’t know, beside avoid defending an idea that he doesn’t know.