مفهوم الاشتقاق في ضوء الدلالة الأصل في كتاب (معجم مقاييس اللغة)‎ لابن فارس (ت 395 ه)‎

Abstract EN

Ibn Faris had a great interested in the origin significance of the words throughout his book “ language standards lexicon”.

He had built the book on it.

Having defined the origin significance of the word linguistically and terminological , it has been cleared that it means(( the first meaning of a word which builds its sub- meaning derivations)).

Derivation was one of the most important devices which Ibn Faris had used in order to figure out the significance relations among the words.

It is one of the most important devices that develops the language and renewal its significances.

This is why Arabic scientists and linguists have strongly paid attention to it.

So there are many researches and Publications through different eras.

Since Ibn Faris was the most prominent scientist who dealt with the origin significance of the word, arguing has been happening among the learners in terms of regarding his book “language standards lexicon” to which type of derivation and the relation between the derivation and the origin significance of the word.

This is the reason behind the research to read definition the derivation linguistically and terminological level.

Then showing the Convergence between the two definitions, since both of them refer to derivate a word form another one.

The talk about the relation between the derivation and measuring on one side and the relation between then on the other.

This is what Ibn Ginny who regarded the measurement as a fundamental base for identifying whether the speech is correct or not.

The arguing between the linguists continued to the types of the derivation.

Some of them considered the derivation falls into two types which are small and large.

Another group of linguists considered it falls into three which are small, large and larger.

While the majority of linguists regarding it falls into four types which are small ,large , larger and older Then the research comes to deal with the concept of the derivation according to Ibn Faris.

It has been shown that work of Ibn Faris did not belong to any of the types of the derivation that are mentioned by linguists.

This is because all types are built by the word derivation which Ibn Faris completely refused it.

He argued that the word must not be a base from which can other words be derived.

Precedence of the word over another contrasts with the function of the language which means getting the understanding and convincing.

This can not be achieved with some words instead of other ones.

So the base is the alphabets of the word.

This can only be as a base of the derivations according to its lexicon.

According to the above , there are two derivation references, the first is a word and the second is significant.

The last is what Ibn Faris relied on with his deriving work and retuning branches to assets.