دراسة نقدية في إدعاء فهد الرومي في باب نسبته القول بتحريف القرآن إلي الشيعة الاثني عشرية في كتاب (تجاهات التفسير في القرن الرابع عشر)‎

Abstract EN

One of the important issues that were raised a long time ago and it may have been raised after the Prophet's departure It is a matter of distorting or not distorting the Holy Quran, Is the Qur’an that is between our hands is distorted? Or did it reach us while it is preserved from any kind of distortion? Whether the distortion was decreased or increased, or something similar? Most of the scholars of the two teams(Shi'a, Sunna) and great researchers in the field of Quranic sciences declare with clues precise that the Holy Qur’an has not distort, Whether the evidence was narrational or a rational .

But with all of that there are many people and especially Dr.

Fahd Al-Roumi, He combined the bulk of his energies and made every effort to attribute the saying about the distortion of the Holy Qur’an to the Twelve Shi'a in his book that called “Etjahat al-tafsir fi al-qarn alrabee ashar”.

From this point of view, the topic of the article will be a critical study on Fahd al- Rumi's theory that the Twelve Shi'a believe that Holy Qur’an was distorted.

This article follows a clear goal, which is the answer to the following questions: What is the evidence of the writer Fahd Al-Roumi that the Imami Shi'a believe that Holy Qur’an was distorted? Are they evidence revolving around the orbit of science and logic, or are they outside this perfect orbit? Was Fahd Al-Roumi able to prove what he claimed in his book, or not? The thesis of the writer Fahd Al-Roumi on the subject of distorting the Qur’an among the Shi'a was not a thesis of elaborate and scientific origins, Sometimes he delves into contradictory and unscientific evidence and far from the orbit of logic, to attribute the saying that the Imami Shi'a believe that Holy Qur’an was distorted from this standpoint, he sought with all his efforts to accuse the Shi'a of infidelity.