النزاع في الحكم على مرتكب الكبيرة في العقائد الإسلامية

Abstract EN

In the name of Allah the MercifulThe conflict in the judgment of the perpetrator of the great in the Islamic faiths Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and peace and blessings be upon our master Muhammad and his family and his friends companions.

Then: The scholars differed and disagreed in the position of the "perpetrator of the great", both old and new, especially in light of developments of the scene in the political, ideological and social spheres.

And in the ence of awareness of the danger of delving into the consequences of the perpetrator of the large, which leads to the atonement of a large segment of the of Muslims in the name of religion and the name of olute Intellectual and ideological freedom, which means detracting from their beliefs without a clear legal basis, and the importance of this issue and seriousness, And the importance of this issue and the seriousness of the provisions have been set and limits to be carried out and guarded by judges and scholars and the rulers, such as Imam Ali (may God have mercy on him), when he faced the extremism of the Kharijites (when they disbelieved because of the arbitration incident), he used them with weapons and the most important of which is: (the weapon of debate and controversy Hundreds of them returned to the center of Islam, and others did not succeed in dissuading them from their expiatory approach) Then I spoke about the most important rules on which the Islamic religion was based and its vision to confront a number of Islamic intellectual movements and ideologies that fueled the phenomenon of atonement ns And the consequences of the effects of a serious and destructive, and then the phenomenon of extremism if spread in the community did not escape from them, under which it is possible to disbelieved the child his father and brother disbelieved his brother for trifle reason And we call on the Almighty to return to the medium and to what he ordered us to follow him, the Quran and the sunna of the prophet who said: ((I have left you two things will never mislead them, the book of God and mu sunna)), In another interview, said ("I have left you on the white target for its night, like its day, for it shall not be depart it after me, only the perishable) Then it is necessary to deal with these people with reason and logic and to return them to the right path with knowledge and understanding, and to establish the argument against them And protect them from overstatement and deviation and return them to the moderation and mediator that characterized our religion and characterized by our true religion Allah says.

"(have we made of you An Ummat justly balanced that you might be witness over the nations and the Apostle a witness over your selves), moderation and mediator and the request of science and culture of the features of this nation is the one who spent weapons in the face of the phenomenon of extravagance and extremism that invaded our societies.

And then all that was said in the past in the case of extravagance and extremism in the judgment of the great perpetrator, It is no more than an intellectual period that has passed by the end of its time And now drunkenness went and came to the idea and the culture which covered all of the nation there is no longer a problem between people, but it is possible to take and respond, there is no longer a justification for extravagance, especially if it is far from the constants Religious and ideological, and in the light of these facts and introductions decided to return to the roots of this problem and studied it the Rooty Ideological purpose and found that the conflict is due to the following objectives: 1-The repercussions of the intellectual, military and political invasion of different parts of the Islamic world and its impact on the prevalence of this phenomenon.2- Extremism of some sects and Islamic intellectual groups and narrow political and ideological horizon.3-The survival of some of these captive groups has some traces of some historical facts and their inability to overcome them.4-the inability of the moderate preachers and intellectuals to take their real role in the awareness of the silent majority that were victims of this crisis.