أثر القرائن في دلالة المشترك اللفظي بين الأصوليين و المفسرين

Abstract EN

There is no doubt that the talk about the evidence needs to know the types and divisions, particularly if it is built on the premise Find problematic linguistic long controversy and debate them.

This is a phenomenon common verbal when linguists interpreters and fundamentalists and Nhah and Blagaan and others, accounting for clues kinds hub can not be overlooked or ignored in the statement signify participation in terms of Arab, especially Quranic them.

Therefore deliberately commentators and fundamentalists to rely on in order to access the meaning Belhaz accurate.

The truth is that the clues when fundamentalists and commentators took grants or say different labels purpose of the statement Mknunat this sacred text by the dismantling of this language is precise and detailed, prompting the interpreter or fundamentalist to the research and investigation of the significance of the text Belhaz precise relation Sometimes the text itself and its evidence essay or In Mqamih sometimes resort to denote the full text of any evidence to the antiques that text and verses from Surat.

has made search examples offered Quranic commentators and fundamentalists to show the extent of dealing with it Belhaz approach to each and every one of them the knowledge and tools.