قرينة ممارسة السيادة في القانون الدولي العام

Abstract EN

The assumption of exercising sovereignty in public international law is completely different from the concept of statute of limitations known in domestic legal systems, because public international law is devoid of a legal rule that precisely defines the period of limitation, while the assumption of exercising sovereignty depends on the many justifications adopted by the international judicial system in many Of the cases before him for adjudication and decision.

The international judicial system has relied on the presumption of exercising sovereignty in many of the cases that have been brought before it on the occasion of its settlement of international disputes and considered it complete evidence in proof whenever states rely on them in order to prove that their practices, actual possession and actions in the disputed territory with another state is a presumption for their exercise of their sovereignty over That territory.