استنتاج مؤشرات لتقييم نضج العمران المصري

Abstract AR

The difference in the developmental impact of planning decisions from one city to another is an important matter for study and investigation, as planning differs in terms of quality and quantity from one city to another.

Each planning decision has a positive impact on one sector of the city and negatively on other sectors, which makes the maximum utilization of the available resources not practically easy, Maximum utilization of resources needs controlling indicators to strike a balance between the various development sectors in the city.

The research assumes the reason for this difference is the existence of a dynamic internal system for each city that works on its own to balance some indicators within the city until it is in a mature position.

This system depends on multiple factors (social - economic - urban -.

.

.

)
And because the factors are unique to each city, therefore, the planning decision has different returns from one city to another due to the difference affecting it, and it is important to understand the internal system of the city's work to be a tool to support the planning decisions with its results for the continuity of development and reaching maturity.

When tracking the factors of city growth, we find that they are many, intertwined and variable, so the factors of growth of the city from the Middle Ages differ from the eras of the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution, and therefore it is difficult to consider one of the factors as important than the other, so to determine the importance of each factor, the research resorted to extracting features and indicators of maturity through the experiences of International cities.

And the setting of weights for the features and indicators by means of recurring statistics in each experiment, establishing a reciprocal relationship between the features and indicators, and extracting the relative importance of each indicator.

The research concluded with the most important results, the most important of which are that social indicators are the leaders in the urban maturity process, and the morphological indicators have a strong influence on the internal system of city growth and its reaching urban maturity.