اعمال احكام قواعد مناهج التنازع

Abstract EN

This research paper focuses on presenting the most important provisions of the methods of resolving conflict between laws.

If the traditional rules of support are still prevalent in resolving conflicts between competing laws and access to the law concerned with conflict through an indirect, neutral method, meaning that the conflicting parties do not yet know which of the competing laws is The specialist in resolving the conflict only after consulting the base of support that works on that identification based on the presence of auxiliary means such as nationality or domicile, then the determination of the nationality law or the home country and with reference to that law concerned begins a new phase in focusing the relationship with the precise legal branch from within the relevant law so that the dispute of the parties is resolved according to And this indirect method in determining the relevant law did not prevent the emergence of a method for a direct approach taken by the rules of direct attribution and approaching the rules of civil police.

The latter rules work according to a direct method in determining the law that should be applied directly, it is a method that to some extent prevents the stage of conflict because the parties know and once The dispute between them and presenting it to the judiciary is that the Iraqi law is the one concerned or any other, such as adapting legal relations, so the Iraqi law is a matter H directly in his competence to adapt legal relationships or determine their nature if requested to do so directly and non-competently.

And close to the direct method of attribution rules with direct application, there are objective rules that were produced by private international commercial transactions that operate according to the direct formula method in determining the applicable law, but it jumped further than that, as it works directly to resolve the parties 'dispute directly and not only does it resolve conflict between laws.