ألفاظ الجرح، و التعديل المصاحبة لقول أبي حاتم الرازي ت (277ه)‎ في الراوي "يكتب حديثه و لا يحتج به" : دراسة تطبيقية من خلال كتاب الجرح و التعديل لابن أبي حاتم الرازي ت (327ه)‎

Abstract EN

This research aims to clarify the ruling of the narrators whom Abu Hatim Al Razi described by saying “he writes his hadith and does not use it as evidence” with another term attached to this description - whether this term precedes or follows this description, and whether it is indicative of modification or defamation through “Al Jarh Wa Ta'dil Book” by Ibn Abu Hatim Al Razi, where I mentioned them according to the order of the book, and mentioned the views of imams other than Abu Hatim in the narrator to know the level of this narrator; Is he follow modification or defamation according to Abu Hatim, and the same applies to other imams.

Whereas, in each chapter I mentioned the significance of the term accompanying the phrase “he writes his hadith and does not use it as evidence”, then I mentioned the narrators who share the same description.

After mentioning the narrators and presenting the sayings of the imams of modification or defamation, other than Abu Hatim, I mentioned a summary of the status of these narrators according to Abu Hatim, and among other imams, as well as I indicated whether Abu Hatim' opinion about the narrator agreed, or disagreed with the opinion of the imams, in every group of narrators described the same structure according to Abu Hatim.

Then I mentioned the results I found through the research, which means that the described narrator is not “Sheikh”, the most important of which are: Describe the man as the imams of the preservation, if he described it to the narrator without presumption, however, if, according to “Sheikh”, the word “Sheikh” is accompanied by a presumption, then the meaning of the accompanying presumption is determined.

The righteousness, whoever is not wrong, who follow truthfulness, is not use them as evidence by Abu Hatim, unless they agree trustworthy.

Whereas, Abu Hatim may agree with the imams to judge the narrator, and he may contradict them with different expressions of judgment.

Whenever the compound description includes multiple levels, some of them are in levels under each other, so this shall be considered an evidence indicating the descent of the narrator's level to the lowest rank.