الجمع لإزالة التعارض : موارده و معالمه و مسالكه و قوادحه

Abstract EN

Removing the apparent conflict between the islamic evidence is an issue that has preoccupied the thinking of scholars of various specialities, from jurists, fundamentalists, modernists and commentators, who have set the rules in the way of dealing with opposing evidence are the scholars of origins, and they mentioned the ways in which the evidence continues to conflict as three: plural, copying, and weighting.

However, they separated the speech in the copying and weighting, and did not give the gathering the same attention.

What made this subject a fertile area for contemporary researchers, I wanted to make a statement about it.

I dealt with some detectives that I found no mention or focus in the writings of the past or contemporaries.

The study of the resources of the collection was shown in the areas where conflicting evidence is combined with the types of conflicting evidence that are the subject of the collection, and this is to emphasize that the phenomenon of plurality is broad, and is not limited to the evidence or texts of the shariaa.

its spoke of the milestones that guided him in the way of collection.

The courses and methods of the collection have also been devoted to a special research, although many research esthesyands have addressed this subject, because of the additions that enrich this topic.

I concluded the search by talking about a number of Nullifiers that invalidate the collection and make it contested.

This study has enriched many examples to clarify the principles of plurality and the rules governing it.