"اللام" المرفوضة : بين جحد الاستحقاق و التسامح في الإلحاق

Abstract EN

This research deals with a letter of the meanings, which is the letter “al”, and reveals the places where the grammarians refused to enter “the lam”, and the tolerance of the grammarians in attracting “the lam” to those combinations.

It is not in the nature of “the blame” nor in its reality, but the disagreement is regarding its entry and non-entry, whether it is suitable in this position or not, and whether the grammarians accepted its inclusion in this structure, or not.

It also shows the reasons and motives that led the grammarians to say that the composition is not needed for it and the sentences and vocabulary are dispensed with, and in turn indicates its importance, and affirms the need for it, and that speech is not dispensed with, and that the composition is not correct without it, relying on what has been reported from the eloquent Arabic, which is taken The language is within it, and it is based on the approval of al-Qaeda on its logic, bearing in mind that resorting to necessity - in an attempt to remove those blame from performing its role in the sentence and the structures of speech - is contrary to the norms of the Arand the principles of their rules.

The hearing was not the only ruling in accepting it and saying it.

Rather, those who said that it should be present in the composition relied on the analogy as well, which represents an important pillar of rooting and reciting.

This study was devoted to “lam” without other letters of meaning.

Because “the blam” is of great importance in strengthening and affirming speech; And because it performs various meanings in the composition, such as specialization, merit, justification and transgression, strengthening, and others, as well as its rotation between the meanings of parsing, firmly and explicitly, and it has a great benefit that necessitates its existence, it is included in nouns, verbs and letters.