القيم الجمالية في مسرحية هاملت لشكسبير في ضوء المنهج الهيغيلي

Abstract EN

The struggle of beauty confirms the reality of beauty as it confirms its opposite, and this is what the idealistic Hegelian philosophy brought.

Conflict is more (relationships) than a struggle of things-in-themselves.

That is why we can say that the awareness of conflict processes and its consequences is the highest stage of aesthetic awareness.

Here, the value of artistic work in its various forms, including theater and artistic beauty, emerges over natural beauty.

Therefore, aesthetic perception is an affirmation of consciousness and degrees of this awareness is thus formed by the aesthetic conscious perceptive where these fall into the mind to create the subject, and with this beauty has surpassed the psychological and physiological need.

Hence the importance of researching knowledge of ideal Hegelian philosophy and how an analytical analogy of the HamletShakespeare play was found in light of the Hegelian method.

The second chapter sheds light on the aesthetic doctrine between Nietzsche, Kant and Schopenhauer.

Schopenhauer relied on Hegel, who broadened his aesthetic philosophical significance, besides Kant, and although he had taken care of it, the opposite has been misunderstood in depth, in the development of a misunderstanding related to aesthetics when This was what Nietzsche was influenced by, and it is a misunderstanding that still persists, except that we find Schopenhauer the first role in this, and therefore we can say that the book Criticism of the Queen of Judgment, which is the book with which a philosophy came to be aesthetic, that everything that was said since it was about art, beauty, knowledge and wisdom has been He was confused by the interpretation of the thought (devoid of all interest), and this is what is caused by the interpretation of the Schopenhauer, but what does it mean by this beautiful definition as an object of impartial pleasure.

So, because of indifference in the self, the actual relationship to purpose begins to appear.

Kant was subjected to misinterpretation in the nineteenth century, and his ideas were subjected in a confused manner by Schopenhauer, which made Nietzsche instead of relying on Schopenhauer, he directly benefited from it and took from the concept of pleasure according to the extent of acceptance And according to what suits us and we like.

The third chapter is the analytical framework: that for each ideal philosophy a study of the aesthetic doctrine of (Kant - Nietzsche - Schopenhauer), while the sample is Hegel's aesthetic philosophy.

Likewise, the truth is infinite, so we arrive at the conclusion that these foundations are not real, and every philosophy in Hegel's view is based on the idea and is therefore an ideal philosophy.

Therefore, every philosophy attributes to a finite definite existence, which is also an absolute and final real existence.

As for the fourth chapter, among its results, the Hegelian beauty theory is one of the most important aesthetic and philosophical theories that helped in the demolition process and ended the era of metaphysical edifices