مطالبة النافي بالدليل : دراسة أصولية تطبيقية

Abstract EN

This research is about one of the most important issues of the science of fundamental of jurisprudence which is the request of the negator for evidence and the importance of this topic is shown in the following: Knowing the methods of Heuristics (inference) on the legal provisions negatively and positively, regarding varied approaches of scholars in this as well as stating the fact of Heuristics that there is no evidence for non-judgment In terms of being satisfied with the mere negative of the ence of the ruling as well as the extent of the loss of evidence after his request confirming the lack of judgment as well as indicating the novelty of the subject as I have not come across a comprehensive study that dealt with the request of the negator with evidence in its origin and application as well as the link between rooting and application reveals the reality of the impact of the disagreement on the rule and that appears in the branches and the falsehood of non-effect is revealed.

I have been keen in this research to explain the type of conflict and its fruits resulting from it with being careful to clarify the aspect of the connection branch's of its origin in order to reveal the true effect of the rule in the branch and to reveal the falsehood of what has no effect.