الترجيح الحديثي عند الأمامية: دراسة بين المنصوص والتخيير

Abstract EN

In the journey of this topic, came the study of hadith preferences, which is a basis for mechanisms of action, which Imamiyah scholars acted upon in the study of Usuli (fundamentals of Usul al Fiqh) contradiction and outweighing.

moreover, deriving this topic from the hadith quotes in a group of narrations that indicated the Tarjeeh (preference/outweighing) as a term used by the Mukallaf (legally competent) or the mujtahid (expert Islamic scholar) about the hadith quantity or the subject, who is in distress or embarrassment from the obligation or function of the process in which a person is.

the hadith research on Tarjeeh (preference/outweighing) is of two types.

the first type is the stipulated one that is among several narrations.

the research has clarified it by inference with two famous narrations, and most of the Imamiya scholars have acted upon it.

the second type is the Tarjeeh (preference/outweighing) by choice, which is a study of the contradiction that some companions acted upon, such as fame or the basis of the qur’anic presentation or the authentic hadith.

so this choice is a functional act, partly on jurisprudential issues, but in the hadith, it is the determination of the ruling through the subject or the choice between two Maḥzūr (forbidden) regarding a subject.

taking note in the research, I would like to say that it is possible to benefit from the conflicting or presented narrations as a narrative inheritance that benefits the current situation to solve modern problems regardless of the weakness of the chain of transmission or the text, or its contradiction to the authentic narrations.