حكم الحج عند الاختلاف في ثبوت الهلال

Abstract EN

Research SummaryThe pilgrims face an affliction issue in most of the years in recent years, the subject of their question, which is that the Hajj rituals are performed in a uniform manner and under the supervision of the state, and none of the pilgrims are allowed to perform the rituals at other than the times specified by them.

The problem is that these timings vary between the Imami school and the doctrine in force in Saudi Arabia, so the day of Arafah and its aftermath do not coincide according to the calculations adopted by the two parties, so the day of Arafah is delayed according to the Imami school than on the Hanbali school of thought.

Here, the problem arises regarding the parts of the Hajj according to the timing of the rituals in Saudi Arabia, with their contradiction with what is proven according to the legal scales used by the Imami school.

The Imami jurists differed on three opinions: The parts of the excuse of Islam as well as anything else.1 Non-parts.2 3.

The detail, if it is possible to match the confirmation of the crescent between the two schools, and the lack of parts with certainty of non-conformity.

The research favored saying the parts for several options, the most important of which is that the difference existed in the era of the infallible imams, peace be upon them, and it was not reported that they forbade participating in the Hajj with the authority at the time, but rather they participated in the Hajj with people within the unified rituals that are supervised by the state