العدول التفسيري للقضاء الدستوري بين التقييد و الاطلاق

Abstract EN

Interpretive moderation is one of the important topics at the present time, especially since most of the world's constitutions explicitly stipulate the competence of the supreme constitutional courts in the interpretation of constitutional and legal texts, and this may result in different interpretations in the interpretation of those texts, that is, interpretative revision.

It has binding power, hence the danger of diverging interpretations, and the effect of this on stability legal positions and the rights of individuals.

Therefore, it has become necessary to entrench the idea of legitimate expectation with the constitutional judge when performing the interpretation of legal texts.

For the purpose of not undermining the legal security of individuals and organizations.