أخطاء المرحلة التقديمية في البحوث الجامعية : قراءة نقدية في نماذج فقهية و أصولية

Abstract EN

The idea of this research revolves around the critique of the introductory stage in university theses specialized in the field of jurisprudence and its fundamentals, and the purpose of addressing this idea is to monitor the common errors at this stage and evaluate in a manner that demonstrates the correctness that should be taken in the formulation of thresholds of messages: titles, s, and introductions.

The research invoked the analytical method with its explanatory and critical dimensions, and it led to results including: 1.

The paragraph of previous studies is the angel of the legitimacy of the research, and a means to seek knowledge of novelty, but it was understood in other words in many jurisprudential and fundamentalist messages.

It shows the cognitive addition.

2.

Statement of the problem or the paragraphs in the introduction; A methodological commitment is made between the researcher and the reader, in light of which the stages of treatment and their results are weighed.

It is noticeable in the jurisprudential and fundamentalist messages the atrophy of awareness of its methodological function, a dystrophy that followed mistakes in its formulation and arrangement It has not been revised from the strange and repulsive obstacles, and it has been arranged before the research objectives, and the principle is that it derives from its questions and reproduces it.