دراسة الوظائف النحوية-البلاغية للحذف و التقدير في سورة آل عمران من خلال تفسيري معاني القرآن و الكشاف

Abstract EN

The difference in the views of the commentators in the Qur'anic verses is in their syntactical, rhetorical and scientific principles, and this difference in view makes a difference in the interpretation of the verses and their understanding and perception.

This research is done by census and descriptive- analytical method.

The result of the comparison of the opinions of the two interpreters is that the overview of Farra is logical and syntactic.

At the opposite point in Zamakhshari's readings, the syntax has the lowest position;.

What is common in the interpretation of the two commentators is the musical and formalist look of these two to some of the examples of elimination.

In quantitative and qualitative terms, Zamakhshari's interpretations have a more meaningful generalization of the text but Farra's predeterminatio less rhetorical interpretation than supernatural appreciation.

Multidimensional readings are seen in the presence of two interpreters; this is seen in the metaphorical form as an attempt to reproduce text and meaning in Farra mind, but in the case of Zamakhshari, there are many other semantic interpretations of the text.