الوجه النحوي بين الراجح و المرجوح : دراسة تحليلية وفقاً لعوامل الأسماء

Abstract EN

The theory of (Alamil and Al-Sanaa Alnahwiyah) acquired a great concern in the Arabic grammar, searchers are divided into supporter and opposing to this theory, variety of grammar faces was produced from this division, even the difference of judgment of one grammar face.

If we meditate the concept of grammar scientist in their establishment of grammar rules we will find that they relied on origins and scales in retiring the grammar, whatever matter opposes or collide with their scales they would consider it weir, ugly, weak, hatred or one of other likeness's features, may be the interpretation that reside in the mind of the grammar scientist is the only exit from this plight, the interpretation that makes the out of rules texts are matching for these rules.

Judgment on grammar face differs between most correct and likely, the reason of this difference is the conflict of grammar rules, conflict of linguistic rules, due to unqualified reading of Arabic language, or being unprofessional of Arab says before creating rules and bases from it, some grammar uses were produced from the grammar scientist's bases that they were obligated to interpret them.

Hence the research has proved the likeness of some likely grammar faces and dismantling them from the likely circle, due to being used in Quran or in poetry text or other, sometime may the evidence become a means to prefer it, or the (sanaa) itself is the most correct, the research comes into requests, first request: operating the (Ismulfael) , second request is : conjunction on the two factors of (Isim Inna), third request was: (Almaful Liejlihe), fourth request: Operating and the fifth request was : Exclusion.