دلالات منهجية في كتابة السيرة النبوية : دراسة حول الاختلاف بين روايات (ابن إسحاق و البخاري)‎ و موقف ابن حجر منها في كتاب المغازي من "صحيح البخاري"

Abstract EN

The most important aspect of Muslim scholars' attention to the Prophet's biography is examining and verifying it in order to arrive at an accurate historical knowledge of it, and to present it in a form purified of the impurities of illusion and falsification.

This aspect of consideration is highlighted in the comparison between the different narratives and weighing them up according to the rules of Hadith narration and the laws of history.

From this, this essay comes to clarify some milestones from the methodology that was followed by scholars in examining and writing the Sira, and this in order to show that the Sira is a historical writing and not a literary narrative that cannot be verified against historical reality.

To achieve this aim, this article is based on studying the issues in which Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar dealt with the differences between the hadiths of Al-Maghazi chapter from “Sahih Al-Bukhari” and Ibn Ishaq's Sira.

So, what is Ibn Hajar's position regarding these differences, and what are the methodological implications we can infer from it?